More illogicalities of “do-gooders.”

It’s ironic that the people that most condemn materialism and most condemn wealth are the ones that want to give it to those with the least of it.

If these things are so bad, why give it to the “moral superiors” known as the poor?

Why corrupt the poor with the “evil” of wealth?

And if wealth is “evil”, that must mean that poverty is good.

So if poverty is good, why do we want to change the situation of the poor?

Why not keep the poor noble? And, by your logic, poor?


Voluntarism and Capitalism.


Things that I have for sale on Kindle.

Where you can financially support me if you so desire.


Don't make an ass of yourself for the whole internet to see. No pressure ;)

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s