Feminist “neckbeard” and “fedora” bullying.

Feminists literally make NO sense.

If it’s simply about equality, then what do “fedoras” and “neckbeards” have to do with equality?

It’s because it isn’t ABOUT equality.

It’s about BULLYING.

It’s not about ENDING bullying:

It’s about “equality“, meaning the ones that were bullied for centuries by bullies now get to bully the former bullies for centuries.

Of course, they don’t even do this for justice’s sake.

They may justify it with the name of “justice“, but of course, it’s just good old-fashioned bullying, except it isn’t “old-fashioned” because the role of bully and bullied has been reversed.

And this is the perverted sense of “justice” that the liberals discuss.

Saying that “all blacks are x“, or anything involving any other race or sex, is racist or sexist to them.

But they have NO qualms about how “whites are responsible” for bad things that are happening to minorities.

They’re the most dishonest, evil people on the face of this planet, and they need to be exposed constantly, before they manipulate young minds into joining them in their evils that sound SO great, with words like “equality.”

The greatest evils are done in the name of good and when the intentions are evil, but even if BOTH are good, that doesn’t mean that said goals are impenetrable from evil.

This is pretty much what is at work here.

From the 4th chapter of Murray Rothbard’s “Egalitarianism as a Revolt Against Nature, and Other Essays” entitled “Justice and Property Rights”.

From the 8th chapter of Murray Rothbard’s “Egalitarianism as a Revolt Against Nature”, entitled “The Great Women’s Liberation Issue: Setting it Straight”.

From the 12th chapter of Murray Rothbard’s “Egalitarianism as a Revolt Against Nature”, entitled “Anarcho-Communism”.

Murray Rothbard – Egalitarianism as a Revolt Against Nature, and Other Essays.

Liberals don’t use logic.

Logic.

Advertisements

6 thoughts on “Feminist “neckbeard” and “fedora” bullying.

  1. Liz

    To quote the author:
    “Feminists literally make NO sense”
    “no means go”

    *** So what you’re trying to say is “feminists literally make GO sense” which to me makes NO sense …. Or should I say it makes GO sense.

    Your blog leaves me with great confusion.

    Reply
    1. codyalanreel Post author

      You’re obviously just trying to be funny with word games. It’s obvious what I meant to anyone but a feminist. If you want to take posts and combine them together, completely devoid of the context of each post, then, sadly, I wouldn’t be surprised, for this is what deceitful people do to convince other people to believe what they themselves believe.

      And, also sadly, it works on the ignorant.

      Reply
    2. codyalanreel Post author

      Actually, you combined a joke of mine with the blog post.

      For one, if you combine something serious with a joke, and try to interpret the two logically, you’re going to be confused, obviously.

      But if you want to know what the joke meant, it was a rape joke. That when a woman says “No”, that means “Go”.

      Boy, you cunts are dense…

      Reply
  2. Pingback: John Stossel – Rape Culture | Voluntarism and Capitalism

Don't make an ass of yourself for the whole internet to see. No pressure ;)

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s